ION INDUSTRIES | LED Zigbee Dimmer | 0–200W | Trailing Edge (RC)

Article number: P90.500.020
Ion Industries
ION INDUSTRIES | LED Zigbee Dimmer | 0–200W | Trailing Edge (RC) ION INDUSTRIES | LED Zigbee Dimmer | 0–200W | Trailing Edge (RC) ION INDUSTRIES | LED Zigbee Dimmer | 0–200W | Trailing Edge (RC) ION INDUSTRIES | LED Zigbee Dimmer | 0–200W | Trailing Edge (RC) ION INDUSTRIES | LED Zigbee Dimmer | 0–200W | Trailing Edge (RC)
ION INDUSTRIES | LED Zigbee Dimmer | 0–200W | Trailing Edge (RC)
ION INDUSTRIES | LED Zigbee Dimmer | 0–200W | Trailing Edge (RC)
ION INDUSTRIES | LED Zigbee Dimmer | 0–200W | Trailing Edge (RC)
ION INDUSTRIES | LED Zigbee Dimmer | 0–200W | Trailing Edge (RC)
ION INDUSTRIES | LED Zigbee Dimmer | 0–200W | Trailing Edge (RC)
New

Zigbee LED dimmer by ION INDUSTRIES for trailing edge (RC) up to 200W. Works with Hue, Homey, Trust and other Zigbee systems.

59,95 *
Default delivery time: 1 - 2 Working days
Shipping costs: € 5,95
Staggered prices
Amount Price
1 € 59,95
2 € 58,95 2% Discount
5 € 57,95 3% Discount
  • Easy installation
  • High-quality product
  • Always shipped with insurance!
Do you have a question about this product?

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Description

ION INDUSTRIES | LED Zigbee Dimmer | 0–200W | Trailing Edge (RC)

The ION INDUSTRIES Zigbee dimmer is a smart flush-mounted dimmer for dimmable 230V LED lights up to 200W. It uses trailing edge dimming (RC) and is compatible with Zigbee 3.0 systems such as Philips Hue, Homey, Trust, and Amazon Echo. The compact size allows for easy installation behind switches.

Product Specifications

  • Power: 0–200W LED

  • Dimming: Trailing edge (RC)

  • Protocol: Zigbee 3.0

  • Compatible with: Hue, Homey, Trust, Echo

  • Control: App + voice (via hub)

  • Memory function & soft start

  • Compact flush mount

  • No hub required for native Zigbee

  • For 230V dimmable LED

 

Reviews

No reviews yet

Please contact us

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Add review

What do you think of the article?

5,0